The release contains exactly what these pages show, as JSON.
Read the release as JSON
{
"projection_version": 4,
"release_id": "2026-10-23.2",
"snapshot_date": "2026-10-23",
"title": "Re-membering",
"people": [
{
"name": "David Joseph",
"role": "Requested this reconstruction; has not endorsed its reasoning"
}
],
"trees": {
"goal": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-g-goal",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "goal",
"text": "People in a willing, bounded community can flourish through being-becoming with the world while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.",
"label": "People flourish together while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "critical_success_factor",
"text": "Participation in shared practices is safe, voluntary and open to withdrawal.",
"label": "Participation in shared practices is safe, voluntary and open to withdrawal.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, slide 18; pp. 31–32, slide 19",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-repair",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "critical_success_factor",
"text": "People can notice strain and repair their shared rhythms.",
"label": "People can notice strain and repair their shared rhythms.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–28, slide 18; p. 32, slide 20",
"basis": "paraphrase"
},
{
"source_id": "extended-passages",
"locator": "p. 7, The somatic commons",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-agency",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "critical_success_factor",
"text": "Tools and environments support purposes that people can question and change.",
"label": "Tools and environments support purposes that people can question and change.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes; p. 32, slide 20",
"basis": "reconstruction"
},
{
"source_id": "slides",
"locator": "pp. 16 and 20",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-learning",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "critical_success_factor",
"text": "People can learn from uncertainty and revise how they act together.",
"label": "People can learn from uncertainty and revise how they act together.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: exploration, uncertainty and learning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 3, 5–7: expected uncertainty, requisite variety, unexpected uncertainty and volatility",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-optout",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "Participants have informed, revocable consent and a trusted way to opt out.",
"label": "Consent is informed and revocable, with a trusted way to opt out.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-company",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "People can access supportive company and protected solitude according to their needs.",
"label": "Supportive company and protected solitude are accessible.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-feedback",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "People can attend to feedback across bodily, social and environmental timescales.",
"label": "People attend to feedback across relevant timescales.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: exploration, uncertainty and learning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 3, 5–7: expected uncertainty, requisite variety, unexpected uncertainty and volatility",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-explore",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "People have permission to explore alternatives and revise shared expectations.",
"label": "People may explore alternatives and revise shared expectations.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: exploration, uncertainty and learning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 3, 5–7: expected uncertainty, requisite variety, unexpected uncertainty and volatility",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-transparent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "People can understand the purposes of tools that affect them and override their operation.",
"label": "Tool purposes are clear and people can override their operation.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: rules made by those affected, design and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's own syntheses concerning the somatic commons and anticipatory tools",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-governance",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "The people affected can govern changes to their shared environments.",
"label": "Affected people can govern changes to shared environments.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: rules made by those affected, design and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's own syntheses concerning the somatic commons and anticipatory tools",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-time",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "The community makes time available for listening and repair.",
"label": "Time is available for listening and repair.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-g-harm",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "necessary_condition",
"text": "People can raise harm and obtain a response that can change the practice.",
"label": "Reports of harm can receive a response that changes the practice.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-gl-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-consent"
],
"to": "rm-g-goal",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, consent as part of the definition of a somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-repair",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-repair"
],
"to": "rm-g-goal",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–28, rupture and repair",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-agency",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-agency"
],
"to": "rm-g-goal",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, design, ownership and whose purposes a tool serves",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-optout",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-optout"
],
"to": "rm-g-consent",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-company",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-company"
],
"to": "rm-g-consent",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-feedback",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-feedback"
],
"to": "rm-g-learning",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: exploration, uncertainty and learning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 3, 5–7: expected uncertainty, requisite variety, unexpected uncertainty and volatility",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-explore",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-explore"
],
"to": "rm-g-learning",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: exploration, uncertainty and learning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 3, 5–7: expected uncertainty, requisite variety, unexpected uncertainty and volatility",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-transparent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-transparent"
],
"to": "rm-g-agency",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: rules made by those affected, design and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's own syntheses concerning the somatic commons and anticipatory tools",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-governance",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-governance"
],
"to": "rm-g-agency",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: rules made by those affected, design and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's own syntheses concerning the somatic commons and anticipatory tools",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-time",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-time"
],
"to": "rm-g-repair",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-harm",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-harm"
],
"to": "rm-g-repair",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-gl-learning",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-g-learning"
],
"to": "rm-g-goal",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–20: co-regulation, consent, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 6: co-regulation and somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: the somatic commons and being-becoming as Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-g-goal",
"work": "clarify_group_and_setting",
"label": "Choose whose shared conditions and which setting the goal concerns.",
"note": "Establish the willing group, situation and scope; no host is yet agreed."
},
{
"ref": "rm-gl-repair",
"work": "test_necessity",
"label": "Test whether repair is necessary for the bounded goal.",
"note": "Review all twelve proposed necessity links, including autonomy, company and solitude, feedback, governance and repair."
},
{
"ref": "rm-g-goal",
"work": "examine_coupling_and_constitution",
"label": "Separate evidence for coupling from claims about what constitutes a mind.",
"note": "Retain the distinction between empirical coupling, contested constitution and philosophical participation; use the glossary and bibliography to improve source tracing without claiming independent verification.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 14–15, slide 11; pp. 18–22, slide 13",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
}
]
},
"current_reality": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-r-machine",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "The body is treated as a private machine to optimise and repair alone.",
"label": "The body is treated as a private machine to optimise and repair alone.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "slides",
"locator": "pp. 6 and 18",
"basis": "paraphrase"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 27, slide 18",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-alone",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "The burden of regulation is left to individuals despite their dependence on relationships and surroundings.",
"label": "Individuals carry a regulation burden shaped by relationships and surroundings.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–28, slide 18",
"basis": "reconstruction"
},
{
"source_id": "extended-passages",
"locator": "pp. 6–7, The somatic commons",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-fixed",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "Institutions prioritise short-term predictability and fixed targets over responses from the wider system.",
"label": "Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-harm",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere.",
"label": "An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, slide 4 and performative excess notes",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-tools",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "Adaptive technologies anticipate people's needs without meaningful shared control of their purposes.",
"label": "Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-agency",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "People’s capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed.",
"label": "People's capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18; p. 32, slide 20",
"basis": "reconstruction"
},
{
"source_id": "slides",
"locator": "pp. 16 and 20",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-policy",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "Regulation and wellbeing are treated primarily as matters of individual optimisation.",
"label": "Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-support",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "Collective support and repair receive less attention.",
"label": "Collective support and repair receive less attention.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-suppress",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored.",
"label": "Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-shaping",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "cause",
"text": "External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices.",
"label": "External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-isolation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "People can become isolated and blamed for difficulties shaped by their relationships and surroundings.",
"label": "People can become isolated and blamed for difficulties shaped by their surroundings.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-rupture",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "Strains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired.",
"label": "Strains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-r-brittle",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "Responses can become brittle when conditions change.",
"label": "Responses can become brittle when conditions change.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-rl-alone",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-policy"
],
"to": "rm-r-alone",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-harm",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-fixed"
],
"to": "rm-r-harm",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, lineal control and performative excess",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-agency",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-shaping"
],
"to": "rm-r-agency",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-policy",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-machine"
],
"to": "rm-r-policy",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is a candidate explanatory bridge, not evidence that a philosophical framing causes a particular institution's policies; alternative causes and incentives require investigation.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-fixed",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-policy"
],
"to": "rm-r-fixed",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-tools",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-policy"
],
"to": "rm-r-tools",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-support",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-alone"
],
"to": "rm-r-support",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-isolation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-support"
],
"to": "rm-r-isolation",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-rupture",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-support"
],
"to": "rm-r-rupture",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 9–10 and 27–31, slides 6 and 18: private-machine framing, individual regulation and shared support",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: somatic commons and regulation as co-regulation are Heath's syntheses",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-suppress",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-fixed"
],
"to": "rm-r-suppress",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-brittle",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-suppress"
],
"to": "rm-r-brittle",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 12–14, slides 4 and 9–10: lineal control, variation and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 4–5: lineal control, performative excess and requisite variety",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-predict-shaping",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-fixed"
],
"to": "rm-r-shaping",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-rl-tool-shaping",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-r-tools"
],
"to": "rm-r-shaping",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18: extended allostatic control, agency and Heath's phones-and-feeds extension",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: White et al. and Heath's own extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-rl-harm",
"work": "test_causality",
"label": "Check the causal claims in a specific situation.",
"note": "Retain the wider-harm check; examine alternative explanations and missing conditions."
},
{
"ref": "rm-rl-agency",
"work": "distinguish_source_claim_from_extension",
"label": "Distinguish the cited smart-home proposal from the phones-and-feeds extension.",
"note": "Retain Heath's extension to phones and feeds as her synthesis, and test the new mediating shaping step."
},
{
"ref": "rm-r-policy",
"work": "test_core_policy",
"label": "Test individual optimisation as the core-policy hypothesis.",
"note": "Test whether individual optimisation is a useful core-policy hypothesis rather than an imposed explanation."
},
{
"ref": "rm-r-isolation",
"work": "ground_undesirable_effects",
"label": "Ground the candidate problems and connections in one setting.",
"note": "Obtain concrete observations of isolation, unrepaired rupture, brittleness and agency loss from the same setting; examine all proposed contributory links."
}
]
},
"conflict": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-c-objective",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "objective",
"text": "The community sustains viable, flourishing relationships.",
"label": "The community sustains viable, flourishing relationships.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-c-protection",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "need",
"text": "People need sufficient stability and protection from overwhelm.",
"label": "People need stability and protection from overwhelm.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-c-adaptation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "need",
"text": "People need adaptability, agency and opportunities to learn.",
"label": "People need adaptability, agency and opportunities to learn.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-c-impose",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "prerequisite",
"text": "Impose standardised individual regulation without participant control.",
"label": "Impose standardised individual regulation without shared control.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-c-participate",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "prerequisite",
"text": "Let the affected people collectively shape and revise how regulation is organised.",
"label": "Affected people shape and revise how regulation is organised.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-cl-protection",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-c-protection"
],
"to": "rm-c-objective",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-cl-adaptation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-c-adaptation"
],
"to": "rm-c-objective",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-cl-impose",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-c-impose"
],
"to": "rm-c-protection",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Candidate assumption to challenge: adequate protection from overwhelm requires externally imposed individual regulation; reliable safeguards might instead be compatible with participant control.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-cl-participate",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-c-participate"
],
"to": "rm-c-adaptation",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Meaningful participant control is hypothesised to be necessary for agency and learning in this bounded case, rather than a universal claim about every form of adaptation.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-cl-conflict",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-c-impose"
],
"to": "rm-c-participate",
"relation": "conflicts_with",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The positions conflict only where they allocate final control of the same decisions in incompatible ways; some standard safeguards and participatory arrangements may coexist.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 12–14, slides 9–10: steadiness, openness, exploration and adaptation",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–30, slide 18: safety, consent and governance",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 5–7: requisite variety, ultrastability and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-cl-impose",
"work": "test_safety_assumption",
"label": "Test whether adequate safety requires imposed control.",
"note": "Challenge the assumption that sufficient safety requires imposed individual control; distinguish reliable safeguards from rigid control."
},
{
"ref": "rm-cl-conflict",
"work": "test_apparent_conflict",
"label": "Check whether the positions conflict over the same decisions.",
"note": "Check whether the two positions conflict over the same decisions and whether participatory safeguards can meet both needs."
}
]
},
"future_reality": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-f-practice",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave.",
"label": "Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave.",
"addresses": [
"rm-r-alone",
"rm-r-rupture"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, slide 18; pp. 31–32, slide 19",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Agree how people can decline participation, raise harm and seek repair before trying a shared practice.",
"label": "Agree how people can decline, raise harm and seek repair before a shared practice.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, commons rules, consent and freedom to step out; pp. 31–32, optional practice",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-settle",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "predicted_effect",
"text": "Shared settling may help some participants feel more able to be with others.",
"label": "Shared settling may help some participants feel more able to be with others.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 31–32, slide 19",
"basis": "reconstruction"
},
{
"source_id": "slides",
"locator": "p. 19",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-pressure",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "A shared practice may create pressure to appear calm or make some participants feel less safe.",
"label": "A shared practice may create pressure or make some participants feel less safe.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, no one owes the room calm and co-regulation can dysregulate; p. 31, safety, consent and trust",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-attune",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Adjust actions by listening to responses from bodies, people and environments.",
"label": "Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments.",
"addresses": [
"rm-r-fixed",
"rm-r-suppress",
"rm-r-brittle",
"rm-r-harm"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 3–4, act, listen and retune; pp. 12–13, learning and uncertainty",
"basis": "paraphrase"
},
{
"source_id": "extended-passages",
"locator": "p. 1, acting with the world",
"basis": "paraphrase"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-learning",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "predicted_effect",
"text": "Feedback can change what is tried next instead of preserving a fixed target.",
"label": "Feedback can change what is tried next instead of preserving a fixed target.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 3–4, feedback loop; pp. 12–13, participation and uncertainty",
"basis": "reconstruction"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-tools",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Make a selected tool's purposes and effects visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and user override.",
"label": "Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override.",
"addresses": [
"rm-r-tools",
"rm-r-shaping",
"rm-r-agency"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-choice",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "desirable_effect",
"text": "People retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.",
"label": "People retain meaningful choices and agency over tool regulation.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-participation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Provide reliable safeguards while giving participants shared control, alternatives and a right to withdraw.",
"label": "Combine reliable safeguards with shared control, alternatives and withdrawal.",
"addresses": [
"rm-r-policy"
],
"derived_from": [
"rm-c-impose",
"rm-c-participate"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-support",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "predicted_effect",
"text": "People may gain safer opportunities for voluntary co-regulation.",
"label": "People may gain safer opportunities for voluntary co-regulation.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-repair",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "desirable_effect",
"text": "The community may develop stronger relational support and capacity for repair.",
"label": "Relational support and capacity for repair may become stronger.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-tool-control",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "predicted_effect",
"text": "People can see and change how the selected tool shapes their attention and routines.",
"label": "People can see and change how the tool shapes attention and routines.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-variation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "predicted_effect",
"text": "Variation and surprise can become sources of learning rather than errors to suppress.",
"label": "Variation and surprise can become sources of learning.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, 12–14 and 32–33, slides 4, 9–10 and 20: acting, listening, uncertainty and retuning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 5–7: dance of agency, requisite variety and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-adaptability",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "desirable_effect",
"text": "People may become more able to adapt together under uncertainty.",
"label": "People may adapt together more readily under uncertainty.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, 12–14 and 32–33, slides 4, 9–10 and 20: acting, listening, uncertainty and retuning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 5–7: dance of agency, requisite variety and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-lived",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "desirable_effect",
"text": "Being-with may become a lived practice that people can evaluate and revise.",
"label": "Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-surveillance",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "undesirable_effect",
"text": "Adaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.",
"label": "Adaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-privacy",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Limit data collection and provide privacy protection, override and accountability for the selected tool.",
"label": "Limit data collection and provide privacy, override and accountability.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-f-solitude",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "injection",
"text": "Protect solitude and allow people to decline shared practices without penalty.",
"label": "Protect solitude and declining participation without penalty.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-fl-settle",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-practice",
"rm-f-consent"
],
"to": "rm-f-settle",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, consent and safety; pp. 31–32, optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-pressure",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-practice"
],
"to": "rm-f-pressure",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28 and 31, co-regulation can dysregulate and no one owes calm",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-protection",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-consent"
],
"to": "rm-f-pressure",
"relation": "prevents",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The safeguard must work in practice without penalty, exclusion or hidden coercion. A stated rule does not guarantee prevention; remaining harm must be assessed.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "p. 28, safety, consent, commons rules and freedom to step out",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-learning",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-variation"
],
"to": "rm-f-learning",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, 12–14 and 32–33, slides 4, 9–10 and 20: acting, listening, uncertainty and retuning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 5–7: dance of agency, requisite variety and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-choice",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-tool-control"
],
"to": "rm-f-choice",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-support",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-participation",
"rm-f-practice",
"rm-f-consent",
"rm-f-solitude"
],
"to": "rm-f-support",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The arrangements must be usable, trusted and responsive to differing needs. Joint inputs propose a contributory route, not a guarantee or a claim that every case requires identical practices.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-repair",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-support"
],
"to": "rm-f-repair",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-tool-control",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-tools",
"rm-f-privacy"
],
"to": "rm-f-tool-control",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Participants must have actual authority and access to change or stop the tool. Visibility or nominal override alone may leave control with its owner.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-variation",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-attune"
],
"to": "rm-f-variation",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, 12–14 and 32–33, slides 4, 9–10 and 20: acting, listening, uncertainty and retuning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 5–7: dance of agency, requisite variety and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-adaptability",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-learning"
],
"to": "rm-f-adaptability",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6, 12–14 and 32–33, slides 4, 9–10 and 20: acting, listening, uncertainty and retuning",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "pp. 2 and 5–7: dance of agency, requisite variety and uncertainty",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-lived",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-repair",
"rm-f-choice",
"rm-f-adaptability"
],
"to": "rm-f-lived",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Relational support, meaningful choice and adaptability must be judged by affected participants; together they remain an incomplete hypothesis about flourishing.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-surveillance",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-tools"
],
"to": "rm-f-surveillance",
"relation": "contributes_to",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-privacy",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-privacy"
],
"to": "rm-f-surveillance",
"relation": "prevents",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The safeguard must work in practice without penalty, exclusion or hidden coercion. A stated rule does not guarantee prevention; remaining harm must be assessed.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 25–26 and 28–31, slides 16 and 18: whether tools widen choices, whose purposes they serve and agency",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 12 and 14: anticipatory technology and Heath's extensions",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-fl-solitude",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-f-solitude"
],
"to": "rm-f-pressure",
"relation": "prevents",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The safeguard must work in practice without penalty, exclusion or hidden coercion. A stated rule does not guarantee prevention; remaining harm must be assessed.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 27–32, slides 18–19: co-regulation, rupture, repair, consent and optional shared practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "glossary",
"locator": "p. 6: somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "pp. 13–14, Part 4: Heath's somatic-commons synthesis",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-f-settle",
"work": "define_participant_assessment",
"label": "Identify actual participants and how they would judge benefit and harm.",
"note": "Assess support, agency, learning and repair alongside harmful effects; calm or compliance alone is not evidence of benefit."
},
{
"ref": "rm-f-pressure",
"work": "examine_safety_and_withdrawal",
"label": "Check whether declining and raising harm are possible in practice.",
"note": "Test whether withdrawal and protected solitude work without penalty and whether dysregulation or pressure persists."
},
{
"ref": "rm-fl-protection",
"work": "test_prevention",
"label": "Check whether consent arrangements actually prevent pressure.",
"note": "Keep consent's protective effect unverified; stated rules may not prevent pressure."
},
{
"ref": "rm-fl-choice",
"work": "test_agency",
"label": "Check whether assessing a tool changes choices and control.",
"note": "Test whether visibility and control produce meaningful choice, including authority to alter or stop the tool."
},
{
"ref": "rm-f-practice",
"work": "establish_conflict_prerequisites_and_actions",
"label": "Establish conflicts, prerequisites and actions with a willing group.",
"note": "Review the newly reconstructed conflict, readiness dependencies and action logic; drafting them does not resolve this work."
},
{
"ref": "rm-fl-privacy",
"work": "test_prevention",
"label": "Test whether the proposed safeguards prevent harm.",
"note": "Assess surveillance risks, actual privacy, override and accountability; do not treat safeguards as guarantees."
}
]
},
"prerequisite": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-p-objective",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "objective",
"text": "A willing group can judge and revise a small voluntary shared practice and one tool's effect on agency.",
"label": "The group can judge and revise a practice and a tool's effects.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-host-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "No willing group and bounded situation have yet been agreed.",
"label": "No willing host or bounded situation has been agreed.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-host",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "A willing host group has agreed a bounded situation for the proposed pilot.",
"label": "A willing host agrees a bounded situation.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-criteria-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "The group may lack agreed meanings of flourishing, agency and harm.",
"label": "Shared meanings of flourishing, agency and harm may be missing.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-criteria",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "Participants have agreed observable criteria for flourishing, agency and harm.",
"label": "Participants agree observable criteria for benefit and harm.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-participation"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-consent-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "Participation may become coercive when consent and withdrawal arrangements are unclear.",
"label": "Unclear arrangements may make participation coercive.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "Participants have usable consent, safety, withdrawal and harm-response arrangements.",
"label": "Consent, withdrawal and harm response are usable.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-consent",
"rm-f-solitude"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-resources-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "The group may lack protected time, space or roles for repair.",
"label": "Protected time, space or repair roles may be missing.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-resources",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "Time, space and repair roles are available for the bounded pilot.",
"label": "Time, space and repair roles are available.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-practice"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-tools-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "Existing tools may prevent participants from understanding or changing how they are regulated.",
"label": "Tools may resist participants' inspection or control.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-tool-control",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible for the participants.",
"label": "The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-tools",
"rm-f-privacy"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-evidence-gap",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "obstacle",
"text": "The group may lack shared evidence about the benefits and harms of the proposed changes.",
"label": "Shared evidence of benefits and harms may be missing.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-p-evidence",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "intermediate_objective",
"text": "Participants have assessed a bounded pilot together and revised what should happen next.",
"label": "Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-attune"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-pl-host",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-host"
],
"to": "rm-p-host-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-criteria",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-criteria"
],
"to": "rm-p-criteria-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-consent"
],
"to": "rm-p-consent-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-resources",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-resources"
],
"to": "rm-p-resources-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-tools",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-tool-control"
],
"to": "rm-p-tools-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-evidence",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-evidence"
],
"to": "rm-p-evidence-gap",
"relation": "overcomes",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-host-criteria",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-host"
],
"to": "rm-p-criteria",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Criteria adopted by a particular group require that willing group's involvement; preliminary drafting can occur before a host is agreed.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-criteria-consent",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-criteria"
],
"to": "rm-p-consent",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Consent to this bounded pilot must be informed by its agreed purposes, observable effects and risks; general withdrawal rules may be prepared earlier.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-consent-evidence",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-consent"
],
"to": "rm-p-evidence",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-resources-evidence",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-resources"
],
"to": "rm-p-evidence",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-tools-evidence",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-tool-control"
],
"to": "rm-p-evidence",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "The illustrative pilot includes a tool as well as a shared practice. A host choosing a different scope must review this dependency.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-pl-evidence-objective",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-p-evidence"
],
"to": "rm-p-objective",
"relation": "necessary_for",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–33, slides 18–20 and notes: consent, governance, harm, repair and questions for practice",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "bibliography",
"locator": "p. 13, Part 4: consent as part of Heath's definition of the somatic commons",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-p-objective",
"work": "validate_readiness",
"label": "Confirm the host's obstacles and readiness dependencies.",
"note": "Confirm which candidate obstacles exist and which readiness dependencies hold for the willing host; clarify resources and scope."
},
{
"ref": "rm-p-tool-control",
"work": "establish_ownership_and_access",
"label": "Establish who can change or stop the selected tool.",
"note": "Establish who can alter the chosen tool and whether meaningful override and reversibility are feasible."
}
]
},
"transition": {
"nodes": [
{
"id": "rm-t-1-condition",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "existing_condition",
"text": "Stress is being discussed mainly as an individual's problem.",
"label": "Stress is discussed mainly as an individual problem.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-map",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "action",
"text": "Map the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people in the chosen situation.",
"label": "Map the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-1-effect",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "expected_effect",
"text": "Participants have a shared picture of what regulates whom.",
"label": "Participants share a picture of what regulates whom.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-2-condition",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "existing_condition",
"text": "The shared picture does not yet supply an agreed aim or participation arrangements.",
"label": "The picture lacks an agreed aim and participation arrangements.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-agree",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "action",
"text": "Agree desired effects, observable criteria, consent and ways to opt out.",
"label": "Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out.",
"implements": [
"rm-p-criteria",
"rm-p-consent"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-2-effect",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "expected_effect",
"text": "Participants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.",
"label": "The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-3-condition",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "existing_condition",
"text": "The existing routines provide little protected opportunity for connection and repair.",
"label": "Routines leave little protected opportunity for connection and repair.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-practice",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "action",
"text": "Offer one optional pause or check-in that participants can change or leave.",
"label": "Offer an optional pause or check-in that people can change or leave.",
"implements": [
"rm-f-practice"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-3-effect",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "expected_effect",
"text": "Participants have a voluntary opportunity for attunement and a way to report strain.",
"label": "People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-4-condition",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "existing_condition",
"text": "A selected tool anticipates needs in ways participants cannot readily inspect or change.",
"label": "A tool anticipates needs in ways people cannot inspect or change.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-audit",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "action",
"text": "Review that tool with participants and enable explanation, privacy protection and override.",
"label": "Review the tool and enable explanation, privacy and override.",
"implements": [
"rm-p-tool-control"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-4-effect",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "expected_effect",
"text": "Participants have greater awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.",
"label": "People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-5-condition",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "existing_condition",
"text": "The benefits and harms of the proposed changes remain uncertain.",
"label": "Benefits and harms remain uncertain.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-review",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "action",
"text": "Ask what helped, harmed or surprised participants, then revise or stop the changes.",
"label": "Ask what helped, harmed or surprised people, then revise or stop.",
"implements": [
"rm-p-evidence"
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-t-5-effect",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"kind": "expected_effect",
"text": "Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using their assessments.",
"label": "Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using assessments.",
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"links": [
{
"id": "rm-tl-map",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-1-condition",
"rm-t-map"
],
"to": "rm-t-1-effect",
"relation": "produces",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is illustrative action logic, not an assigned plan or a verified causal claim. A host must confirm the current conditions, consent, resources, authority and missing supporting conditions.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-tl-agree",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-1-effect",
"rm-t-2-condition",
"rm-t-agree"
],
"to": "rm-t-2-effect",
"relation": "produces",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is illustrative action logic, not an assigned plan or a verified causal claim. A host must confirm the current conditions, consent, resources, authority and missing supporting conditions.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-tl-practice",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-2-effect",
"rm-t-3-condition",
"rm-t-practice"
],
"to": "rm-t-3-effect",
"relation": "produces",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is illustrative action logic, not an assigned plan or a verified causal claim. A host must confirm the current conditions, consent, resources, authority and missing supporting conditions.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-tl-audit",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-2-effect",
"rm-t-4-condition",
"rm-t-audit"
],
"to": "rm-t-4-effect",
"relation": "produces",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is illustrative action logic, not an assigned plan or a verified causal claim. A host must confirm the current conditions, consent, resources, authority and missing supporting conditions.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-tl-review",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-3-effect",
"rm-t-4-effect",
"rm-t-5-condition",
"rm-t-review"
],
"to": "rm-t-5-effect",
"relation": "produces",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "This is illustrative action logic, not an assigned plan or a verified causal claim. A host must confirm the current conditions, consent, resources, authority and missing supporting conditions.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
},
{
"id": "rm-tl-feedback",
"status": "proposed",
"accepted_by": [],
"contributors": [
{
"name": "AI assistant",
"role": "assistant"
}
],
"from": [
"rm-t-5-effect"
],
"to": "rm-t-map",
"relation": "feeds_back_to",
"assumptions": [
{
"text": "Reassessment may prompt remapping or a changed scope; it does not imply that the original conditions recur.",
"by": "AI assistant"
}
],
"source_refs": [
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 4–6 and 31–33, slides 4 and 19–20: act, listen, retune; optional practice and questions",
"basis": "inference"
},
{
"source_id": "spoken-script",
"locator": "pp. 28–31, slide 18 and notes: consent, tools, agency and governance",
"basis": "inference"
}
]
}
],
"backlog": [
{
"ref": "rm-t-map",
"work": "ground_current_conditions",
"label": "Replace illustrative conditions with the host's account.",
"note": "Replace illustrative current conditions with the host group's account and test missing supporting conditions."
},
{
"ref": "rm-t-review",
"work": "agree_owners_and_assessment",
"label": "Agree owners, feedback providers and observation arrangements.",
"note": "Agree action owners, relevant feedback providers and how benefits, harms and surprises will be observed before any trial is called ready."
}
]
}
},
"feedback": [],
"history": [
{
"release_id": "2026-10-23.1",
"date": "2026-10-23",
"title": "First proposed reconstruction",
"summary": "The practical argument from three supplied companion documents, with 18 proposed statements, 11 proposed connections, page references and open review work. No participant endorsement, trial or outcome is recorded.",
"changes": [
{
"type": "added",
"refs": [
"rm-g-goal",
"rm-g-consent",
"rm-g-repair",
"rm-g-agency",
"rm-gl-consent",
"rm-gl-repair",
"rm-gl-agency",
"rm-r-machine",
"rm-r-alone",
"rm-r-fixed",
"rm-r-harm",
"rm-r-tools",
"rm-r-agency",
"rm-rl-alone",
"rm-rl-harm",
"rm-rl-agency",
"rm-f-practice",
"rm-f-consent",
"rm-f-settle",
"rm-f-pressure",
"rm-f-attune",
"rm-f-learning",
"rm-f-tools",
"rm-f-choice",
"rm-fl-settle",
"rm-fl-pressure",
"rm-fl-protection",
"rm-fl-learning",
"rm-fl-choice"
],
"note": "AI reconstruction from the supplied slides, spoken script with notes and extended passages."
}
]
},
{
"release_id": "2026-10-23.2",
"date": "2026-10-23",
"title": "A fuller account across all six views",
"summary": "Expanded to 77 proposed statements and 62 proposed connections, with five original documents by Margeret Heath, a connected causal explanation, conflict, benefits and harms, readiness conditions and an act–listen–retune sequence. The first release is preserved; implementation approval does not endorse the reasoning.",
"changes": [
{
"type": "added",
"refs": [
"rm-g-learning",
"rm-g-optout",
"rm-g-company",
"rm-g-feedback",
"rm-g-explore",
"rm-g-transparent",
"rm-g-governance",
"rm-g-time",
"rm-g-harm",
"rm-gl-optout",
"rm-gl-company",
"rm-gl-feedback",
"rm-gl-explore",
"rm-gl-transparent",
"rm-gl-governance",
"rm-gl-time",
"rm-gl-harm",
"rm-gl-learning",
"rm-r-policy",
"rm-r-support",
"rm-r-suppress",
"rm-r-shaping",
"rm-r-isolation",
"rm-r-rupture",
"rm-r-brittle",
"rm-rl-policy",
"rm-rl-fixed",
"rm-rl-tools",
"rm-rl-support",
"rm-rl-isolation",
"rm-rl-rupture",
"rm-rl-suppress",
"rm-rl-brittle",
"rm-rl-predict-shaping",
"rm-rl-tool-shaping",
"rm-c-objective",
"rm-c-protection",
"rm-c-adaptation",
"rm-c-impose",
"rm-c-participate",
"rm-cl-protection",
"rm-cl-adaptation",
"rm-cl-impose",
"rm-cl-participate",
"rm-cl-conflict",
"rm-f-participation",
"rm-f-support",
"rm-f-repair",
"rm-f-tool-control",
"rm-f-variation",
"rm-f-adaptability",
"rm-f-lived",
"rm-f-surveillance",
"rm-f-privacy",
"rm-f-solitude",
"rm-fl-support",
"rm-fl-repair",
"rm-fl-tool-control",
"rm-fl-variation",
"rm-fl-adaptability",
"rm-fl-lived",
"rm-fl-surveillance",
"rm-fl-privacy",
"rm-fl-solitude",
"rm-p-objective",
"rm-p-host-gap",
"rm-p-host",
"rm-p-criteria-gap",
"rm-p-criteria",
"rm-p-consent-gap",
"rm-p-consent",
"rm-p-resources-gap",
"rm-p-resources",
"rm-p-tools-gap",
"rm-p-tool-control",
"rm-p-evidence-gap",
"rm-p-evidence",
"rm-pl-host",
"rm-pl-criteria",
"rm-pl-consent",
"rm-pl-resources",
"rm-pl-tools",
"rm-pl-evidence",
"rm-pl-host-criteria",
"rm-pl-criteria-consent",
"rm-pl-consent-evidence",
"rm-pl-resources-evidence",
"rm-pl-tools-evidence",
"rm-pl-evidence-objective",
"rm-t-1-condition",
"rm-t-map",
"rm-t-1-effect",
"rm-t-2-condition",
"rm-t-agree",
"rm-t-2-effect",
"rm-t-3-condition",
"rm-t-practice",
"rm-t-3-effect",
"rm-t-4-condition",
"rm-t-audit",
"rm-t-4-effect",
"rm-t-5-condition",
"rm-t-review",
"rm-t-5-effect",
"rm-tl-map",
"rm-tl-agree",
"rm-tl-practice",
"rm-tl-audit",
"rm-tl-review",
"rm-tl-feedback"
],
"note": "Added the missing structure across all six views: 59 statements and 51 connections, including the stability–participation conflict, three routes to improvement, harmful branches, readiness conditions and an illustrative feedback sequence."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-g-goal"
],
"before": "People can think and act together by tending the bodily, social and material conditions that support them, while retaining agency.",
"note": "Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-r-fixed"
],
"before": "Fixed targets are pursued without attending to responses from the wider living system.",
"note": "Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-r-tools"
],
"before": "Technologies can shape people’s attention and routines around purposes they have not chosen.",
"note": "Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-f-tools"
],
"before": "Assess tools by whether they widen people’s choices and whose purposes they serve.",
"note": "Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-f-choice"
],
"before": "Tools can support chosen purposes while preserving people’s ability to question them.",
"note": "Revised from an intermediate predicted effect to the desired outcome of meaningful choice and agency."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-rl-alone",
"rm-rl-agency",
"rm-fl-learning",
"rm-fl-choice"
],
"note": "Reconnected the individual-burden and agency branches through their new mediating statements, and inserted variation and practical tool control into the learning and choice routes."
},
{
"type": "credited",
"refs": [
"rm-g-goal",
"rm-f-tools"
],
"note": "Added the supplied glossary and indexed bibliography. Margeret Heath is the sole credited source author across the five original PDFs. Source locators distinguish paraphrase, reconstruction and inference; primary studies have not been independently verified."
},
{
"type": "revised",
"refs": [
"rm-g-goal",
"rm-r-policy",
"rm-cl-impose",
"rm-fl-privacy",
"rm-p-objective",
"rm-t-review"
],
"note": "Preserved and revised the ten existing review entries and added nine. All reasoning remains proposed; no willing host, trial, assigned action owner, feedback commitment or outcome is established."
}
]
}
],
"publication_kind": "source_reconstruction",
"authors": {
"heath": {
"name": "Margeret Heath",
"role": "Sole author of the five credited Being-Becoming With the World, Talk 1: Re-membering documents; has not reviewed this map"
}
},
"sources": [
{
"id": "slides",
"kind": "supplied_document",
"author": "heath",
"title": "Being-Becoming With the World · Talk 1: Re-membering · slide deck",
"description": "Supplied 20-page slide deck by Margeret Heath, subtitled The extended mind and the body as somatic commons. Gives the compact sequence and distinguishes coupling, contested extension and philosophical participation. Page numbers refer to the supplied PDF. The PDF is not republished."
},
{
"id": "spoken-script",
"kind": "supplied_document",
"author": "heath",
"title": "Being-Becoming With the World · Talk 1: Re-membering · spoken script with notes",
"description": "Supplied 33-page spoken script and notes by Margeret Heath. The main source for qualifications about evidence, philosophical synthesis, consent, safety, repair and the difference between cited authors and Heath’s extensions. Speaker cues and invitations are source material. References use the printed PDF page numbers. The companion glossary and indexed bibliography have also been supplied; primary studies have not been independently checked."
},
{
"id": "extended-passages",
"kind": "supplied_document",
"author": "heath",
"title": "Being-Becoming With the World · Talk 1: Re-membering · extended passages",
"description": "Supplied nine-page companion by Margeret Heath containing longer versions trimmed for time and material parked for later talks. Read alongside the spoken script’s more explicit qualifications. This is a companion version of the same talk, not independent corroborating evidence. The original PDF is not republished."
},
{
"id": "glossary",
"kind": "supplied_document",
"author": "heath",
"title": "Being-Becoming With the World · Talk 1: Re-membering · glossary of 72 terms",
"description": "Supplied seven-page glossary by Margeret Heath, defining the talk’s terms and pointing to sources and slides. Distinguishes coupling from constitution, expected from unexpected uncertainty and volatility, and Heath’s somatic-commons concept from the cited work it draws on. A companion aid to interpretation, not independent evidence or an independently verified literature review. The PDF is not republished."
},
{
"id": "bibliography",
"kind": "supplied_document",
"author": "heath",
"title": "Being-Becoming With the World · Talk 1: Re-membering · indexed bibliography",
"description": "Supplied 14-page indexed bibliography by Margeret Heath, with slide and thematic indexes, full references and Part 4 identifying Heath’s own syntheses. Its source-checking annotations belong to that document; they do not mean this commons independently verified the cited studies. Heath’s phones-and-feeds extension, somatic commons and philosophical syntheses remain distinguishable from the authors she cites. The PDF is not republished."
}
],
"views": {
"goal": [
{
"id": "flourishing-with-boundaries",
"title": "Flourishing with autonomy and boundaries",
"summary": "Four proposed success factors and eight supporting conditions. Read each arrow as a necessity claim to test in a bounded community, rather than a complete recipe for flourishing.",
"nodes": [
"rm-g-goal",
"rm-g-consent",
"rm-g-repair",
"rm-g-agency",
"rm-g-learning",
"rm-g-optout",
"rm-g-company",
"rm-g-feedback",
"rm-g-explore",
"rm-g-transparent",
"rm-g-governance",
"rm-g-time",
"rm-g-harm"
]
}
],
"current_reality": [
{
"id": "individual-burden",
"title": "When regulation becomes an individual problem",
"summary": "A private-machine framing is connected to a candidate policy of individual optimisation, reduced collective support and possible isolation or unrepaired rupture. These are source-based hypotheses, not observations of a named group.",
"nodes": [
"rm-r-machine",
"rm-r-policy",
"rm-r-alone",
"rm-r-support",
"rm-r-isolation",
"rm-r-rupture"
]
},
{
"id": "fixed-targets",
"title": "When predictability displaces learning",
"summary": "Fixed targets can overlook wider harms, while suppressing variation may make responses brittle. The muted policy statement belongs to the preceding part; alternative causes and missing conditions remain open.",
"nodes": [
"rm-r-fixed",
"rm-r-harm",
"rm-r-suppress",
"rm-r-brittle"
]
},
{
"id": "tools-and-purposes",
"title": "Whose purposes shape attention and choice?",
"summary": "Adaptive tools and pressure for predictability may increase external shaping of attention. Heath’s extension to phones and feeds is her synthesis; whether that shaping narrows agency needs testing.",
"nodes": [
"rm-r-tools",
"rm-r-shaping",
"rm-r-agency"
]
}
],
"conflict": [
{
"id": "stability-and-participation",
"title": "Can reliable safety coexist with shared control?",
"summary": "Both protection from overwhelm and adaptability matter. The apparent conflict rests on an assumption that safety requires imposed individual regulation. Check whether the positions concern the same decisions and whether participatory safeguards can meet both needs.",
"nodes": [
"rm-c-objective",
"rm-c-protection",
"rm-c-adaptation",
"rm-c-impose",
"rm-c-participate"
]
}
],
"future_reality": [
{
"id": "shared-rhythms",
"title": "Voluntary support, with a real right to leave",
"summary": "Shared rhythms, consent, protected solitude and participatory safeguards jointly support the proposed route to co-regulation and repair. Settling may help some people; pressure and loss of safety remain possible. No one owes the room their calm.",
"nodes": [
"rm-f-practice",
"rm-f-consent",
"rm-f-solitude",
"rm-f-participation",
"rm-f-support",
"rm-f-repair",
"rm-f-settle",
"rm-f-pressure"
]
},
{
"id": "choices-and-control",
"title": "Tools that people can inspect, change and stop",
"summary": "Visibility and privacy safeguards must be backed by actual authority to change the tool. More meaningful choice is a prediction; surveillance is a possible harmful branch and privacy protection is an untested remedy.",
"nodes": [
"rm-f-tools",
"rm-f-privacy",
"rm-f-tool-control",
"rm-f-choice",
"rm-f-surveillance"
]
},
{
"id": "listen-and-adjust",
"title": "Learn from variation and revise the next move",
"summary": "Listening and retuning may turn surprise into learning and support adaptation. Relevant feedback may arrive across bodily, social and environmental timescales; useful uncertainty is not the same as overwhelming people.",
"nodes": [
"rm-f-attune",
"rm-f-variation",
"rm-f-learning",
"rm-f-adaptability"
]
},
{
"id": "lived-practice",
"title": "Bring support, choice and adaptability together",
"summary": "The three routes meet jointly in a revisable practice of being-with. The muted statements show the other parts’ outcomes; none is presented as sufficient on its own, and the joint route remains incomplete and untested.",
"nodes": [
"rm-f-lived"
]
}
],
"prerequisite": [
{
"id": "agree-setting",
"title": "Find a willing host and agree what matters",
"summary": "Only the absence of an agreed host is established here. The other obstacles are candidates for a host to check. A group needs to make the purpose and criteria its own.",
"nodes": [
"rm-p-host-gap",
"rm-p-host",
"rm-p-criteria-gap",
"rm-p-criteria"
]
},
{
"id": "safe-readiness",
"title": "Make participation and control workable",
"summary": "Usable consent and harm response, available time and repair roles, and meaningful tool control address candidate obstacles. Preparation can happen in parallel; drawing these objectives does not establish readiness.",
"nodes": [
"rm-p-consent-gap",
"rm-p-consent",
"rm-p-resources-gap",
"rm-p-resources",
"rm-p-tools-gap",
"rm-p-tool-control"
]
},
{
"id": "assess-and-revise",
"title": "Create shared evidence and revise together",
"summary": "For this illustrative pilot, consent, resources and tool control are readiness conditions for a shared assessment. Benefits, harms and surprises need actual experience and relevant participants’ judgements.",
"nodes": [
"rm-p-evidence-gap",
"rm-p-evidence",
"rm-p-objective"
]
}
],
"transition": [
{
"id": "map-relations",
"title": "Map what regulates whom",
"summary": "Illustrative condition and action, not an observation or assigned task. A willing host would identify its relationships, tools and routines. Later assessments feed back into this inquiry without assuming that the original problem recurs.",
"nodes": [
"rm-t-1-condition",
"rm-t-map",
"rm-t-1-effect"
]
},
{
"id": "agree-purpose",
"title": "Agree the purpose and participation arrangements",
"summary": "A shared picture supports agreeing desired effects, observable criteria, consent and withdrawal. The action requires willing participants and workable arrangements, not agreement with the author’s ontology.",
"nodes": [
"rm-t-2-condition",
"rm-t-agree",
"rm-t-2-effect"
]
},
{
"id": "optional-practice",
"title": "Offer a small practice people can change or leave",
"summary": "With the purpose and participation arrangements in place, a host could offer an optional pause or check-in and a way to report strain. This can proceed alongside the tool review.",
"nodes": [
"rm-t-3-condition",
"rm-t-practice",
"rm-t-3-effect"
]
},
{
"id": "review-tool",
"title": "Review one tool and enable practical choice",
"summary": "With the same agreed purpose, participants could inspect one tool and seek explanation, privacy protection and override. This branch does not depend on completing the shared-practice branch.",
"nodes": [
"rm-t-4-condition",
"rm-t-audit",
"rm-t-4-effect"
]
},
{
"id": "listen-retune",
"title": "Listen to benefits, harms and surprises, then retune",
"summary": "The illustrative branches come together for assessment. Ask what helped, harmed or surprised people and revise or stop; the cycle has no assigned owner, agreed feedback provider or recorded result.",
"nodes": [
"rm-t-5-condition",
"rm-t-review",
"rm-t-5-effect"
]
}
]
},
"overview": [
{
"type": "cards",
"eyebrow": "What has to be true",
"title": "Flourishing with room to choose",
"text": "The goal holds autonomy and personal boundaries together with relational support. Its proposed conditions concern voluntary participation, learning from uncertainty, repair and purposes that people can question and change.",
"ids": [
"rm-g-consent",
"rm-g-learning",
"rm-g-repair",
"rm-g-agency"
],
"link": [
"goal.html",
"Inspect the goal and its supporting conditions →"
]
},
{
"type": "cards",
"eyebrow": "What stands in the way",
"title": "When regulation becomes an individual problem",
"text": "The map now connects the private-machine framing to individual optimisation, reduced collective support, pressure for predictability and technologies without shared control. Isolation, unrepaired rupture, brittleness and diminished agency are candidate effects to investigate.",
"ids": [
"rm-r-policy",
"rm-r-isolation",
"rm-r-rupture",
"rm-r-brittle",
"rm-r-agency"
],
"link": [
"in-the-way.html",
"Explore the connected causal explanation →"
]
},
{
"type": "clouds",
"eyebrow": "The tension behind the choices",
"title": "Enough safety and enough openness",
"text": "Protection from overwhelm and the ability to adapt are both legitimate needs. The proposed conflict asks whether sufficient safety really requires imposed individual regulation. Participatory safeguards are a possible response to that assumption.",
"featured": "stability-and-participation"
},
{
"type": "cards",
"eyebrow": "What could change",
"title": "Support, choice and learning together",
"text": "Offer practices people can adapt or leave; make one tool contestable and reversible; act, listen and retune. These routes contribute jointly to a lived, revisable practice. Pressure to appear calm and surveillance remain possible harms; safeguards need to work in practice.",
"ids": [
"rm-f-participation",
"rm-f-tools",
"rm-f-attune",
"rm-f-pressure",
"rm-f-surveillance"
],
"link": [
"change.html",
"Inspect benefits, joint conditions and possible harms →"
]
},
{
"type": "cards",
"eyebrow": "What must become possible",
"title": "Readiness belongs to a willing group",
"text": "A host must agree the situation and criteria, make consent and withdrawal usable, secure time and repair arrangements, and establish actual control over the tool. These are proposed readiness conditions, not completed preparations.",
"ids": [
"rm-p-host",
"rm-p-consent",
"rm-p-resources",
"rm-p-tool-control"
],
"link": [
"prerequisites.html",
"Review the obstacles and intermediate objectives →"
]
},
{
"type": "cards",
"eyebrow": "How the proposal could be tried",
"title": "Map, agree, try, listen and retune",
"text": "An illustrative sequence maps the setting and agrees a bounded purpose. A voluntary practice and a tool review can then proceed in parallel. Participants assess what helped, harmed or surprised them and revise or stop. No host, trial or owner is assigned.",
"ids": [
"rm-t-map",
"rm-t-agree",
"rm-t-practice",
"rm-t-audit",
"rm-t-review"
],
"link": [
"actions.html",
"Follow the sequence and feedback loop →"
]
},
{
"type": "wider",
"eyebrow": "The argument behind the practice",
"title": "Body, relationships and a wider world",
"text": "Heath’s talk moves through embodied cognition, predictive processing, extended minds and shared timing toward the somatic commons. Evidence for coupling, contested constitution of mind and philosophical participation remain distinct. These six views are temporary analytical cuts through reciprocal processes across timescales; they are the first bounded application, not eighteen completed maps of Body, We and World."
},
{
"type": "credits",
"eyebrow": "Sources and interpretation",
"title": "Margeret Heath’s Re-membering",
"text": "Margeret Heath is the sole author of the five credited source documents: slides, spoken script with notes, extended passages, glossary and indexed bibliography. The AI is responsible for selecting, paraphrasing and connecting the material. Every item has a locator and a labelled basis; source credit is not author endorsement."
}
],
"retired": []
}