Re-membering
From Margeret Heath’s Re-membering · reconstructed by AI
Question 6 of 6 · Actions
Who does what?
Actions, and what each should achieve.
- Statements
- 15
- Connections
- 6
- Open questions
- 2
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: each action should produce the effect above it.
Action 1 of 5
Trace one activity through time
Trace how bodies, others, tools and places shape attention, coordination and available possibilities over time. The condition is illustrative, not an observation of a host; later assessment feeds back into this inquiry.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have an initial account of reciprocal influences, timing and changing capacities in the chosen activity.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle that can revise both the shared activity and its purposes.From Margeret Heath
↺ feeds back to Trace one concrete activity over time: how bodies, others, tools and places shape attention, coordination and possibilities for action.
Beyond this part · 1 link
- Participants have an initial account of reciprocal influences and changing capacities. produces The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. in “Agree the purpose and participation arrangements”
Action 2 of 5
Agree the purpose and participation arrangements
A shared picture supports agreeing desired effects, observable criteria, consent and withdrawal. The action requires willing participants and workable arrangements, not agreement with the author’s ontology.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have an initial account of reciprocal influences, timing and changing capacities in the chosen activity.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe shared picture does not yet supply an agreed aim or participation arrangements.From Margeret Heath
- ActionAgree desired effects, observable criteria, consent and ways to opt out.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 4 links
- The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. produces People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain. in “Offer a small practice people can change or leave”
- The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria. produces People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool. in “Review one tool and enable practical choice”
- Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out. puts into practice Participants agree observable criteria for benefit and harm. First steps
- Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out. puts into practice Consent, withdrawal and harm response are usable. First steps
Action 3 of 5
Offer a small practice people can change or leave
With the purpose and participation arrangements in place, a host could offer an optional pause or check-in and a way to report strain. This can proceed alongside the tool review.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have a voluntary opportunity for attunement and a way to report strain.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe existing routines provide little protected opportunity for connection and repair.From Margeret Heath
- ActionOffer one optional pause or check-in that participants can change or leave.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain. produces Participants can repeat a cycle that can revise shared activity and its purposes. in “Review changes in capacities and purposes”
- Offer an optional pause or check-in that people can change or leave. puts into practice Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave. The change
Action 4 of 5
Review one tool and enable practical choice
With the same agreed purpose, participants could inspect one tool and seek explanation, privacy protection and override. This branch does not depend on completing the shared-practice branch.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants have greater awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a bounded purpose and usable criteria for a voluntary pilot.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionA selected tool anticipates needs in ways participants cannot readily inspect or change.From Margeret Heath
- ActionReview that tool with participants and enable explanation, privacy protection and override.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool. produces Participants can repeat a cycle that can revise shared activity and its purposes. in “Review changes in capacities and purposes”
- Review the tool and enable explanation, privacy and override. puts into practice The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
Action 5 of 5
Review changes in capacities and purposes
The illustrative branches come together to ask what helped, harmed or surprised people, and what changed in their capacities or purposes. Continue, revise or stop, including reconsidering the shared purpose. No owner, feedback provider or result is assigned.
Draws on Margeret Heath (document).
Outline
- Expected effectParticipants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle that can revise both the shared activity and its purposes.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
- Expected effectParticipants have a voluntary opportunity for attunement and a way to report strain.From Margeret Heath
- Expected effectParticipants have greater awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.From Margeret Heath
- Illustrative conditionThe benefits and harms of the proposed changes remain uncertain.From Margeret Heath
- ActionAsk what helped, harmed or surprised participants, what changed in their capacities or purposes, and whether to continue, revise or stop.Who: unassignedFrom Margeret Heath
- ↑ produces all of these together
Beyond this part · 2 links
- Participants can repeat a cycle that can revise shared activity and its purposes. feeds back to Trace how one activity changes attention, coordination and possibilities. in “Trace one activity through time”
- Review benefits, harms, surprises and changes in capacities or purposes. puts into practice Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps. First steps
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a transition tree. How a commons works →