Release 2026-10-23.2
A fuller account across all six views
Expanded to 77 proposed statements and 62 proposed connections, with five original documents by Margeret Heath, a connected causal explanation, conflict, benefits and harms, readiness conditions and an act–listen–retune sequence. The first release is preserved; implementation approval does not endorse the reasoning.
- Added
Added the missing structure across all six views: 59 statements and 51 connections, including the stability–participation conflict, three routes to improvement, harmful branches, readiness conditions and an illustrative feedback sequence.
59 statements and 51 connections
People can learn from uncertainty and revise how they act together.Consent is informed and revocable, with a trusted way to opt out.Supportive company and protected solitude are accessible.People attend to feedback across relevant timescales.People may explore alternatives and revise shared expectations.Tool purposes are clear and people can override their operation.Affected people can govern changes to shared environments.Time is available for listening and repair.Reports of harm can receive a response that changes the practice.Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems.Collective support and repair receive less attention.Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored.External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices.People can become isolated and blamed for difficulties shaped by their surroundings.Strains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired.Responses can become brittle when conditions change.The community sustains viable, flourishing relationships.People need stability and protection from overwhelm.People need adaptability, agency and opportunities to learn.Impose standardised individual regulation without shared control.Affected people shape and revise how regulation is organised.Combine reliable safeguards with shared control, alternatives and withdrawal.People may gain safer opportunities for voluntary co-regulation.Relational support and capacity for repair may become stronger.People can see and change how the tool shapes attention and routines.Variation and surprise can become sources of learning.People may adapt together more readily under uncertainty.Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise.Adaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.Limit data collection and provide privacy, override and accountability.Protect solitude and declining participation without penalty.The group can judge and revise a practice and a tool's effects.No willing host or bounded situation has been agreed.A willing host agrees a bounded situation.Shared meanings of flourishing, agency and harm may be missing.Participants agree observable criteria for benefit and harm.Unclear arrangements may make participation coercive.Consent, withdrawal and harm response are usable.Protected time, space or repair roles may be missing.Time, space and repair roles are available.Tools may resist participants' inspection or control.The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible.Shared evidence of benefits and harms may be missing.Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps.Stress is discussed mainly as an individual problem.Map the relationships, tools and routines that regulate people.Participants share a picture of what regulates whom.The picture lacks an agreed aim and participation arrangements.Agree desired effects, criteria, consent and ways to opt out.The pilot has a bounded purpose and usable participation criteria.Routines leave little protected opportunity for connection and repair.Offer an optional pause or check-in that people can change or leave.People have a voluntary chance to attune and a way to report strain.A tool anticipates needs in ways people cannot inspect or change.Review the tool and enable explanation, privacy and override.People gain awareness and practical choice over the selected tool.Benefits and harms remain uncertain.Ask what helped, harmed or surprised people, then revise or stop.Participants can repeat an act–listen–retune cycle using assessments.and 51 connections - Reworded
Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.
Before
People can think and act together by tending the bodily, social and material conditions that support them, while retaining agency.NowPeople in a willing, bounded community can flourish through being-becoming with the world while retaining autonomy and personal boundaries.
- Reworded
Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.
Before
Fixed targets are pursued without attending to responses from the wider living system.NowInstitutions prioritise short-term predictability and fixed targets over responses from the wider system.
- Reworded
Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.
Before
Technologies can shape people’s attention and routines around purposes they have not chosen.NowAdaptive technologies anticipate people's needs without meaningful shared control of their purposes.
- Reworded
Revised to express the fuller argument and bounded scope.
Before
Assess tools by whether they widen people’s choices and whose purposes they serve.NowMake a selected tool's purposes and effects visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and user override.
- Reworded
Revised from an intermediate predicted effect to the desired outcome of meaningful choice and agency.
Before
Tools can support chosen purposes while preserving people’s ability to question them.NowPeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.
- Reworded
Reconnected the individual-burden and agency branches through their new mediating statements, and inserted variation and practical tool control into the learning and choice routes.
and 4 connections - Credited
Added the supplied glossary and indexed bibliography. Margeret Heath is the sole credited source author across the five original PDFs. Source locators distinguish paraphrase, reconstruction and inference; primary studies have not been independently verified.
- Reworded
Preserved and revised the ten existing review entries and added nine. All reasoning remains proposed; no willing host, trial, assigned action owner, feedback commitment or outcome is established.