Re-membering
From Margeret Heath’s Re-membering · reconstructed by AI
Question 4 of 6 · The change
What will we change?
The change, and what it should lead to.
- Statements
- 18
- Connections
- 14
- Open questions
- 6
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: from each change to the effects it should have.
Part 2 of 4
Tools that people can inspect, change and stop
Visibility and privacy safeguards must be backed by actual authority to change the tool. More meaningful choice is a prediction; surveillance is a possible harmful branch and privacy protection is an untested remedy.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- Desired effectPeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.From Margeret Heath
- Possible harmAdaptive tools may expose personal information or enable surveillance.From Margeret Heath
Beyond this part · 6 links
- People retain meaningful choices and agency over tool regulation. contributes to Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise. in “Bring support, choice and adaptability together”
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. is meant to address People's capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed. In the way
- Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. put into practice by The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
- Limit data collection and provide privacy, override and accountability. put into practice by The selected tool is visible, contestable and reversible. First steps
Part 3 of 4
Learn from variation and revise the next move
Listening and retuning may turn surprise into learning and support adaptation. Relevant feedback may arrive across bodily, social and environmental timescales; useful uncertainty is not the same as overwhelming people.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Beyond this part · 6 links
- People may adapt together more readily under uncertainty. contributes to Being-with may become a lived practice that people evaluate and revise. in “Bring support, choice and adaptability together”
- Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. is meant to address Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system. In the way
- Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. is meant to address Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored. In the way
- Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. is meant to address Responses can become brittle when conditions change. In the way
- Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. is meant to address An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere. In the way
- Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. put into practice by Participants assess the pilot together and revise next steps. First steps
Part 4 of 4
Bring support, choice and adaptability together
The three routes meet jointly in a revisable practice of being-with. The muted statements show the other parts’ outcomes; none is presented as sufficient on its own, and the joint route remains incomplete and untested.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- Desired effectBeing-with may become a lived practice that people can evaluate and revise.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to all of these together
- Desired effectPeople retain meaningful choices and agency over how tools regulate them.From Margeret Heath
- Desired effectThe community may develop stronger relational support and capacity for repair.From Margeret Heath
- Desired effectPeople may become more able to adapt together under uncertainty.From Margeret Heath
- ↑ contributes to all of these together
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a future reality tree. How a commons works →