Re-membering
From Margeret Heath’s Re-membering · reconstructed by AI
Question 2 of 6 · In the way
What stands in the way?
What is happening now, and why.
- Statements
- 13
- Connections
- 13
- Open questions
- 4
How to read it. Read from the bottom up: each arrow means “contributes to”.
Part 1 of 3
When regulation becomes an individual problem
A private-machine framing is connected to a candidate policy of individual optimisation, reduced collective support and possible isolation or unrepaired rupture. These are source-based hypotheses, not observations of a named group.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Outline
- ProblemPeople can become isolated and blamed for difficulties shaped by their relationships and surroundings.From Margeret Heath
- ProblemStrains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired.From Margeret Heath
Beyond this part · 5 links
- Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems. contributes to Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system. in “When predictability displaces learning”
- Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems. contributes to Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control. in “Whose purposes shape attention and choice?”
- Regulation and wellbeing are treated as individual optimisation problems. addressed by Combine reliable safeguards with shared control, alternatives and withdrawal. The change
- Individuals carry a regulation burden shaped by relationships and surroundings. addressed by Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave. The change
- Strains and ruptures in relationships can remain unrepaired. addressed by Offer shared rhythms of rest and meeting that participants can adapt or leave. The change
Part 2 of 3
When predictability displaces learning
Fixed targets can overlook wider harms, while suppressing variation may make responses brittle. The muted policy statement belongs to the preceding part; alternative causes and missing conditions remain open.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Beyond this part · 5 links
- Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system. contributes to External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices. in “Whose purposes shape attention and choice?”
- Institutions favour predictability and targets over responses from the wider system. addressed by Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. The change
- An intervention can meet its target while causing unintended harm elsewhere. addressed by Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. The change
- Surprise and variation are suppressed rather than explored. addressed by Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. The change
- Responses can become brittle when conditions change. addressed by Adjust actions by listening to bodies, people and environments. The change
Part 3 of 3
Whose purposes shape attention and choice?
Adaptive tools and pressure for predictability may increase external shaping of attention. Heath’s extension to phones and feeds is her synthesis; whether that shaping narrows agency needs testing.
Draws on Margeret Heath (documents).
Beyond this part · 3 links
- Adaptive technologies anticipate needs without meaningful shared control. addressed by Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. The change
- External systems increasingly shape people's attention and choices. addressed by Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. The change
- People's capacity to choose and learn can be narrowed. addressed by Make a tool visible, contestable and reversible, with consent and override. The change
Where this comes from
In the Logical Thinking Process this view is a current reality tree. How a commons works →