Persistent Systems Theory · The proposed goal
Help a group last.
Cooperate, adapt, withstand.
What keeps a group going while others, under the same pressures, come apart? Explore how cooperation, adaptation and robustness might be matched to the world a group actually faces.
Read the goal of record
A group persists through time and does well in the environment it actually faces: it meets its aims, keeps its members' trust and well-being, and resolves its conflicts.
The source author has not reviewed or endorsed it.
See the sources →
Get involved
Help this commons move forward
You do not need to agree with the whole map. Start with one thing you can help clarify.
Find your way into the reasoning
See the map →Explore the fuller account · 62 statements · 45 connections
The proposed goal
A group persists through time and does well in the environment it actually faces: it meets its aims, keeps its members' trust and well-being, and resolves its conflicts.
Reconstructed by AI; awaiting participant review
From Stephen Le (documents)
Inspect the goal →From the documents to a shared question
Stephen Le’s Adaptive Persistence asks three questions of a group: can we cooperate, can we adapt, can we tolerate disruption? It turns the answers into five steps a group can take to match its capacities to its environment. This map follows that protocol.
62 proposed statements
45 proposed connections
What has to be true
Cooperate, adapt, withstand, and fit the world
Adaptive Persistence asks three questions of a group: can we cooperate, can we adapt, can we tolerate disruption? A fourth condition is that the mix suits how volatile, hazardous and varied the group’s environment is.
What stands in the way
Fixes that treat symptoms
Pressure for visible progress and fear of vulnerability keep fixes on the surface, so conflict returns. Free riders make cooperation hard to sustain.
The tension behind the choices
A dilemma a group has to work through
Openness and self-protection pull against each other in a competitive field. This is a proposed reading of the sources, offered for a real group to test.
Assumptions under the arrows
- 1
Any expression of need will be read as weakness, whatever words it is put in.
Assumed by AI assistant under conflicts with
What could change
Find the mismatch, then close it
Assess the environment and the group’s capacities, emphasise the capacity the environment calls for, and use the ACT matrix to bring what really gets in the way into the open, with success criteria agreed at the start.
What must become possible
An agreed issue and a safe way to adjust
A group needs one issue nobody objects to, shared data on its environment and capacities, someone trained to lead the matrix, and a format and vocabulary that suit it. These are proposed readiness conditions, not completed preparations.
How it could be tried
Orient, assess, analyse, adjust, repeat
The summary’s five steps, as an illustrative sequence for one group. The existing conditions are examples, not observations; no group, facilitator, owner or date is assigned.
A framework and a practice
From the Persistence Framework to what a group can do
Stephen Le’s Persistence Framework joins Adaptive Persistence, a protocol for cooperation, with Procedural Ethics and Persistent Systems Theory. This map follows the protocol as the two Adaptive Persistence documents describe it.
Sources and interpretation
Stephen Le’s Adaptive Persistence
Persistent Systems Theory and Adaptive Persistence are Stephen Le’s, and both credited documents are his. The AI is responsible for selecting, paraphrasing and connecting the material. Every item has a page locator and a labelled basis; source credit is not author endorsement.
| Whose ideas | Drawn from their supplied documents statements · connections | Related points only statements · connections |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen LeAuthor of Persistent Systems Theory and Adaptive Persistence, and of both credited documents; has not reviewed or endorsed this reconstruction | 62 · 45 | 0 · 0 |
| AI assistantSelected, worded and connected every item; it cannot accept anything | all 62 · 45 | |
A credit says where an idea comes from, not that its author agrees with this wording. None of the people credited has reviewed it.
The supplied documents and their limits →Where this commons comes from · 2 sources
Created from 2 sources
Explore the sources →Document representations, not original covers. Supplied documents that present one author’s work; they are not independent bodies of evidence.