Source reconstruction · Everything here is proposed. An AI prepared this map from supplied documents, with page references on every statement and connection. The source author has not reviewed or endorsed it. Sources and limits →
Reason Commons
Source reconstruction · Proposed

Persistent Systems Theory

From Stephen Le’s Adaptive Persistence documents · reconstructed by AI

Published 26 October 2026
Release 2026-10-26.1

About this record

62 proposed statements and 45 proposed connections reconstructed by the AI from Stephen Le’s two Adaptive Persistence documents. Every item has a page reference. Stephen Le has not reviewed or endorsed the map; his four case studies are his own reports. No group, trial, facilitator, owner or observed result is recorded.

Sources and limits

Created from 2 sources

Explore the sources →

Document representations, not original covers. Supplied documents that present one author’s work; they are not independent bodies of evidence.

This is a proposed AI reconstruction of Stephen Le’s Adaptive Persistence from two supplied documents: his three-page overview and his ten-page summary for Analogue Group. The AI is responsible for this map’s selection, wording and connections. Every statement and connection has a page locator and a labelled basis: paraphrase, reconstruction, inference or related point. Stephen Le has not reviewed or endorsed it.

01A Meta-Protocol for CooperationExplore

A Meta-Protocol for Cooperation · Adaptive Persistence summary for Analogue Group

A ten-page summary by Stephen Le, last updated 11 October 2026: the challenge of cooperation, the Persistence Framework, the five-step meta-protocol, 24 design principles across coordination, adaptability and robustness, the ACT group matrix, formats for adjustment and four case studies from his facilitation. The case studies are the author’s own reports. Page numbers refer to the PDF.

By Stephen Le. Read the original ↗

Cited in this release by 62 statements and 41 connections. Citation counts do not measure independent evidence or endorsement.

Follow this source into the reasoning

Showing 3 examples; inspect each item for its complete source references.

02Adaptive Persistence overviewExplore

Adaptive Persistence overview

A three-page overview by Stephen Le, last updated 30 September 2026: the framework’s three questions, who can use it and its six-step process. An earlier companion to the summary. Page numbers refer to the PDF.

By Stephen Le. Read the original ↗

Cited in this release by 6 statements and 4 connections. Citation counts do not measure independent evidence or endorsement.

Follow this source into the reasoning

Showing 3 examples; inspect each item for its complete source references.

A framework and a protocol

The summary places Adaptive Persistence, a protocol for cooperation, in a larger Persistence Framework with a meta-ethics, Procedural Ethics, and a meta-cosmology, Persistent Systems Theory. It says the ethics and the theory are not essential to fostering cooperation but help sustain it in the long run (summary, p. 2). This map follows the protocol: three questions about a group’s capacities, an assessment of its environment, and five steps to reduce the mismatch between them.

The case studies

The summary reports four cases from the author’s own facilitation, using lighter ProSocial variations of the method: a genomics nonprofit, a small company and its contractor, a jazz quartet and two leaders of a foodways nonprofit (pp. 8–9). They are the author’s reports, not independent evidence, and the summary itself asks for further cases in competitive, innovative or hazardous settings. Inspect the attributed observation →

What counts as progress?

No group, facilitator, owner, baseline or observed outcome is established. The protocol asks a group to agree success criteria when it orients and to stop once they are met; those criteria belong to the group that tries it. Conditions in the action sequence are illustrative, not observations of an actual group.

Reading the sources

Page references use the PDFs’ page numbers. The therapeutic methods the summary draws on, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Emotionally Focused Therapy, are described here, not evaluated.

What “accepted for now” means

Named people are willing to build on a statement or connection for now. It records their judgement at the time. It does not establish truth, and it does not mean everyone agrees: each item names exactly who accepted it.

Contributed is not the same as accepted

Each item records who contributed the idea and, separately, who accepted it. Ideas suggested by the AI are attributed to the AI, and only people can accept anything.

What isn't here

Local file paths, approval receipts and private collaboration notes are not published; the source documents are linked, not reproduced. No endorsement by Stephen Le, assigned owner, trial commitment or observed outcome is recorded.

A snapshot, not a live feed

This is release 2026-10-26.1, published 26 October 2026. It is the first release, so there is no earlier wording to compare yet.

Whose ideas these are

Whose ideasDrawn from their supplied documents
statements · connections
Related points only
statements · connections
Stephen LeAuthor of Persistent Systems Theory and Adaptive Persistence, and of both credited documents; has not reviewed or endorsed this reconstruction62 · 450 · 0
AI assistantSelected, worded and connected every item; it cannot accept anythingall 62 · 45

A credit says where an idea comes from, not that its author agrees with this wording. None of the people credited has reviewed it.

People

WhoContributed
statements · connections
Accepted for now
statements · connections
David JosephSupplied the sources and requested this reconstruction; has not endorsed its reasoning0 · 00 · 0
AI assistantSuggestions from the AI; it cannot accept anything62 · 45—